I mentioned it before, but I'll say it again. Just focusing on one, which is the full use of the agreement provisions within the Species at Risk Act, sections 11, 12, 13, 73, and there's a pile of others. Those are the incentive-based vehicles where there is discretion. The minister doesn't have to, but he or she may, and that's what works elsewhere because that's the vehicle to frame the landscape-level solutions with local people in it and remove all the likelihood of lawsuits, etc., just because you have critical habitat. You can have critical habitat here, and through the agreement, you can permit all sorts of activities that are really low risk to the survival of the multiple species in there.
That's the certainty in it. The single recommendation is to get on with the act of using the conservation agreement provisions in the Species at Risk Act.