With respect, the CEAA legislation itself contemplated from its origins that there are reasonable alternatives. That's why they have a clause about substitution, which has been used very sparingly and came into force with the change to the National Energy Board Act enabling participant funding, which our sector completely supported. We believe public participation is an important element to that. So consolidation doesn't have to just be within CEAA. So no, we're not arguing for deconsolidation at all. Keep in mind as well just one important feature: for the self-assessment within the current legislation, about three-quarters of that is about federal government projects, not private industry projects. So there is a big difference in how you want to structure your approaches on those two things. And for private industry, where there is a major regulator they are the best-placed regulator, in our view.
On October 27th, 2011. See this statement in context.