Thank you.
Most of my questions will be to Ms. Kenny.
You made an early comment that these processes need to be efficient and timely. I'm all in agreement with that. I know that most proponents would like a quick no rather than a long, dragged on process that might end up in a no. I know in the British Columbia EA process, one of the changes that was made in the previous decade was to put in an early off-ramp, because before if a proponent got in the process, they had to go through the whole process, even if it was clear early on. Is the off-ramp process adequate in CEAA'S structure, or is that a potential place to focus on getting an early no so that you're not tied up and the regulators aren't tied up unnecessarily?