I think the act is fine in terms of the content requirements for screenings. But sometimes there's a disconnect between what the act requires and what responsible authorities are generating in the form of screening. There is an opportunity for perhaps better outreach and educational and professional development that could be delivered by the agency, so that responsible authorities and the proponents and others know exactly what's expected of them when they're trying to complete a screening.
I would also say in fairness that the quality of screenings has been mixed. I agree with the commissioner that there have been screenings of questionable quality—let's put it that way. But I've seen some good screenings, too. This identifies a need for perhaps better outreach and better education for people who are doing the screenings, so that they fully understand their legal obligations in terms of environmental content.