I think there are a number of things we could be looking at.
To start with, I'd base it in the initial phase on looking at the environmental farm planning process, because that then identifies some of the areas where habitat could be protected. When you go through that process, you evaluate what you can do, if you're going to make some changes, to mitigate damage on habitat. These incentives could be a number of things. For instance, it could be some co-shared funding to put in alternative water systems to keep cattle away from stream beds. It could be developing partnerships with some of the conservation groups that are already out there, whether it be Delta Waterfowl or Ducks Unlimited.
The other thing we need to look at is the whole concept of developing pilots. This gets back to the management aspect. I think one of the better examples of where pilots were developed was the alternative land use services program. A number of pilots were developed. They actually demonstrated that they could be an effective tool to protect habitat, without a lot of outside investment. I think when we're looking at those pilots, what we should be starting to look at is how to take it from a pilot stage to a program stage. I know that's one of the frustrations on the farm side, that when we do a pilot, we may find something that works very well, but then how do we lever it up so that it could be replicated in different provinces? The reason I say replicated in different provinces is that we have to understand that what is done out west might be a wee bit different from what's done in eastern Canada. But the concepts are the same: to identify what needs to be protected. The base of that would likely be an environmental farm plan program, and then you'd have long-term programs that would drive the result you wanted.