In our view—and it's borne through experience of the solutions that we've been supporting—the two can travel together. You can make decisions around the most highly valued areas for wildlife, at the same time as you make decisions around what are the most highly valued areas for development in a region. There are times when there is an overlap, but many times there are ways to recognize, in a boreal context, that you can move forward and protect an adequate level of both.
Perhaps I could just take 10 more seconds. One of the features of a land use plan is that they are renewed, so in essence they're evergreen. They're not developed once. They are renewed typically in regular cycles so that as new information emerges, you can adjust your plans accordingly.