Is that directed at conservation particularly? Tax incentives for donations is one way, but certainly, in our world, the removal of the capital gains tax on ecological gifts, the eco-gifts program, has been a huge incentive. But it doesn't replace actually being able to bring matched money to the table under a private-public partnership. It's that combination that seems to drive people.
Jonathan was mentioning how to get more people to do this. We found a lot more people interested in easements as a result of those kinds of incentives being available on the landscape. The question is that you can get more people involved, but perhaps you don't have the same permanence of the outcome versus having a smaller group involved, regarding permanence, so what's the combination of those things that makes the most sense going forward.