Certainly.
Basically the way we do it is by focusing at the moment on these 82 natural areas. Within those natural areas, you'll have various properties. We're trying to have conservation arrangements on a core of those properties, and then to be able to link them within that natural area that's been deemed important from a conservation planning point of view, because there are species at risk there or whatever other ecological values we're looking at.
Some of those arrangements have not yet been made between those places on a working landscape. As Mr. Scarth said, we often rely on what individual landowners are doing in those particular parts of the world because they haven't formed part of those particular natural areas that have been deemed to be priorities for actual investment.
As we go forward, it's a matter of looking at how we do a better job with conservation for those particular corridors. I'll ask Michael if I get this wrong, but certainly out west and in many parts of Canada, you'll often find that they follow riparian corridors, which seem to be the places where you end up with the most biodiversity and rationale for why you'd want to do conservation in those places.
Correct?
Okay.