No, it's different. I would have the U.S. Farm Bill in the incentive category. I'd put easements in the acquisition category. I think the more certainty you insist upon, the less of a footprint you're going to affect, so if you want to buy land, if you want to buy easements, you will have a long-term effect, but you will have a long-term effect on a small footprint of the landscape because landowners are not willing, in my view, to give up and sell that much land that you would have any significant effects.
What the U.S. did was incorporate incentives directly into its farm policy, which was a significant step, so no longer is it being delivered as an add-on or a peripheral program. It was at the heart of the U.S. Farm Bill and it was able, therefore, to really get attention and to make a significant investment in incentives. That had a remarkable effect on wildlife production in the U.S., and, as I said, it is the only program we can point to in the last 30 years that has had a significant impact ecologically.