Mr. Siekaniec, I was interested that both you and Mr. Lounds talked about wetland mitigation, conservation offsets, biodiversity credits, and so on. It's endlessly frustrating to look at some developments in which the developer is forced to mitigate right next door to where the environmental effect took place, while 200 kilometres away is an absolute jewel of a piece of environment that is under real threat and that would deliver real conservation benefits, if it were conserved.
Would you recommend that the federal government or all governments be much more flexible in terms of mitigation policies?