No. Our organization would just rather there be no subsidies that lead to habitat degradation. I think the first thing is to redo all those subsidies and see whether there are ones that are pushing things negatively on the habitat side. Those should be absolutely removed. If we're going to support our rural communities, let's find other ways of doing it with the same funding, saying we don't necessarily want more of something we can't sell for a good price. Society has said we want these products, and we're willing to pay you for that.
On May 7th, 2013. See this statement in context.