Certainly a go-slow approach. I don't think there was any investigation into the value of those lands and how they're going to be protected. But obviously the people of Saskatchewan are speaking up and I think this process may be slowing down. There are two pieces. There is some federal land involved, the Govenlock pasture. That's the one we're saying is in former sage grouse range. It should stay in federal ownership and should be managed as a natural wildlife area. In our perspective with the current pasture patrons, and the like, things can continue on in Govenlock, but we need to refocus the effort there.
For the other ones that were provincial lands but were leased, again before you give them up, make sure that there are safeguards in place to ensure those biodiversity values that many of those pastures had will be conserved. That hasn't been done. We've gone through a similar process in Alberta with public land sales where there was no public input, no evaluation, and it's had negative consequences for biodiversity. So again we need to review all federal lands and before PFRA gets rid of theirs, we need to review those.