Thanks for the question because I think, at least in my mind, there's been considerable confusion across this country with reference to changes to the Navigable Waters Protection Act. My understanding of the act, and I've been with the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters for approximately 25 years now, is that act is not an environmental protection piece of legislation. It was specifically targeted to protect rights of navigation and therefore access. As a result, organizations like ours—the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters—have been very supportive of this Canadian right to navigate our waters. In other words, our ability to access habitats, our ability to go to places to go fishing and hunting can be directly related to our continued ability to navigate public waters. Therefore we want to see that right to access maintained.
On the environmental protection pieces of legislation, there are other examples of that. You referred to, for example, recent changes to the federal Fisheries Act. We've been working, I believe, quite cooperatively with the federal government based on the commitment to enhance recreational, commercial, and aboriginal fisheries. We've been working to improve what was the status quo. To be frank, the status quo in Ontario had not been working. We needed improvements and we're encouraged that the federal government has given that commitment to work with us to improve the status quo.