Yes, so it's an ongoing thing that any business does and the bigger the business, the more savings you'll find going through those processes.
The only reason I make that point, Mr. Robitaille, is because you said earlier if a company was cutting back on something, like cutting back on spending, all of a sudden you would destroy the real capability of that company. That's a very untrue statement and I just wanted to have that clarified.
Some of the work that you did talk a little about and one of the statements you made was that industry will play a key role in conservation going forward. I was very intrigued by that statement because I also believe it to be a very true statement. You gave some examples. You talked about OPG and the Milton quarry, and some of the peat industry work. I was wondering if you could expand on just one of those cases. I know you talked a little about the Milton quarry, but maybe you could talk about some of the work the peat industry is doing.
To talk about the aspect of understanding that the work that these organizations are doing, to a large degree.... It is unfortunate that they're paid lip service and never counted when we look at what we're doing for conservation efforts in Canada, when we look at these international things such as IUCN. They don't count all that work as being anything that's contributing to our conservation efforts in Canada and the fairness of that with the great work that industry is doing. Could you comment on that?