Thank you. When you're looking at tracking acres, or composite conservation, it's a problem. It is a huge problem because one of the first issues is that acres come and go. You may have a conservation agreement for 25 years, and you have 200 acres. All of a sudden you're at year 26 and you've lost 200 acres.
There are all types of things, and also the length and type of conservation activities that are going on, so it's very difficult to track down. For example, I used to manage the North American waterfowl management plan, and we work on a tracking system called the NTS, national tracking system. We started working on that in 1992. We're still working on that. It's very difficult.
If you take one organization, they're fine. You can track their acres, and they can do it. Government, for example, gives out grants for money. Part of the grant agreement process is to report back with their accomplishments, but when you start trying to track different organizations and government to see what has been accomplished, you're getting the use of different definitions. For example, you're going from a stewardship agreement, which some consider to be influenced, while others consider it to be secured.
So you could have an increased stake that you don't actually have. I used to have a fairly good sizeable lot myself, and I did a lot of habitat conservation. I did about a quarter-mile stream rehabilitation. I did a lot of work, and I know a lot of people who do that, a lot of people. That will never show up in any report anywhere.