I would have to clarify a couple of points there. The first is that COSEWIC does not determine how SARA is implemented. What COSEWIC's recommendation would do would be to define what constitutes the wildlife species and whether or not those aquaculture individuals can be separated from the wildlife species under SARA. That's an implementation issue. That's not a COSEWIC issue per se.
What was reported was that there were no genetic differences between the material that was used in aquaculture and the natural populations, which posed some challenges for how the material was dealt with and how it was distinguished. But COSEWIC does not have the scope or the ability to do anything but assess the wildlife species. What you're talking about are implementation issues that fall outside the committee's realm.