I think part of the disconnect is in some ways semantic. I think when we talk about changes to SARA, what the scientific community is generally not in favour of is changes to the legislation itself. There's no evidence that we can find, in looking at the enactment, the enforcement, the implementation of SARA, that there are structural problems with the legislation itself.
What we see instead is that there are challenges with implementation and a lack of policy development. That does not require amendments to SARA. That could be done outside the scope of amendments, for example, with a policy to speed up various processes. There's nothing limiting the development of additional policies around that. So I would look for any evidence that there are structural problems with SARA. We can't find it.
What we see instead are challenges with implementation.