A balanced approach, certainly. But I would also say that SARA does take a fairly balanced approach. If you take a look at those seven recovery action plans that have been made, they're not all about habitat. Indeed, not one of them protects additional habitat than what was already protected prior to their recovery action plans, and they have very reasonable additional measures that involve community involvement.
For example, the most recently listed recovery action plan for the piping plover requires that we do things like not have off-leash dog areas in the nesting habitat of the piping plover. That's a very reasonable sort of community activity that I think most people would agree with.
From my perspective, SARA is taking those reasoned, balanced approaches to protecting habitat, changing human activities in a way that we can move forward. The concern is the backlog. From my tabulations, the nearly 76 or so files that have been put forward from COSEWIC to the Minister of the Environment have actually not been formally submitted to government so that the timing of the SARA process can start acting. So when we talk about delays in implementation, those are the sorts of things that worry us.