Thank you very much.
Mr. Bleaney, I was very interested in your testimony, especially your statement that the Species At Risk Act is illustrative of the restrictions that Canadian legislation can put on the options available to provide for habitat conservation and positive environmental outcomes.
Again, I'm not singling out the Species At Risk Act here, but it's just the idea that current environmental legislation can actually inhibit habitat conservation, which I think people would find remarkable.
Could you expand on that and give me some specific examples?