Yes, we work with the UPA and with Quebec's department of agriculture. Agriculture in Quebec is concentrated in the St. Lawrence lowlands, where the land is most fertile. We do feel that agriculture, which is a source of food for human beings, must take precedence over objectives, but we believe it is possible to reconcile those two aspects.
Agricultural producers have everything to gain from wetlands conservation. If wetlands are not conserved, flooding during heavy rains will wash high levels of soil into watercourses, and rich, arable soil will be enormously depleted. Wetlands conservation thus benefits both parties, farmers and society.
We believe we must assist farmers and offer them compensation if there are wetlands on their lands. They should be offered financial incentives, as is done under the Clean Water Act in the United States. These producers must be supported, and society should do it.
It is interesting to note from an agricultural standpoint that new wetlands will be created. Producers have understood that the nutrient- and phosphorous-rich water that they use and that passes through their fields can pollute watercourses, and they will therefore filter the water from the wetlands they create on their lands.
Both parties are really becoming receptive to the idea of working toward reconciliation. As I said, these producers really must be granted financial support.