It's hard for me to draw a direct connection on the adaptation issues of dealing with climate change and on the operation of our facilities. Again, weather patterns change, precipitation patterns change, and the hydroelectric side is a risk, and I think the jury's out as to what that actually is. Most of our issues dealing with adaptation are more on how infrastructure is designed to withstand storms, whatever.
It's hard to see a direct connection between our habitat restoration or protection activities and climate other than, as Dan pointed out, there are a lot of co-benefits. A lot of the OPG—not from what Dan said but I know from my own experience when I worked there. A lot of our work in habitat was promoting biodiversity. There are related co-benefits in terms of there being a carbon sink and preserving biodiversity as well at the same time. But to say this is a huge risk area to conservation plans, I have a hard time drawing the connection.