Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Perhaps what my colleague opposite was trying to get at...and I would only be so presumptuous as to try to paraphrase some of his comments. He sort of set a very macro-level view but didn't talk about specific actions or a specific impact on your industry, or how specific practices affect the management of habitat, which is really the core of what our study is today.
So I'm going to ask a question that I would like each of you to answer. I'm going to be interested to hear the answer from the Canadian Wildlife Federation as well.
You all spoke in different terms about what I would characterize as programs that may be part of your corporate social responsibility directive. In your opinion, what are some of the best practices for habitat conservation that you've employed in terms of what my colleague Mr. Sopuck mentioned as actual environmental outcomes? Could you speak a little bit to some of the indicators that you use for that?
Then as a follow-on to that, is there anything that government can do to promote the adoption of those activities or perhaps go a little further to incent industry to take that next step, perhaps going beyond the envelope of where we're at right now?
I think it was the Forest Products Association that spoke about the 35% increase in performance. What can government do to basically incent industry to perhaps be a better performer in habitat conservation, and what's working right now?
I'll start with Mr. Burpee.