That's a good question. As you know, it's a continuing conversation. No decisions have been taken.
There are indeed those. In fact, some of the original framers of the Species at Risk Act said that implementation at the time was imperfect. Not all of the advice was taken in terms of application of the law and they have been aware of it for some time. Again, it's barely a decade old. It's a young piece of legislation, and over those 10 years some of the problems that were identified and foreseen have accumulated.
One of those problems is the order in which species at risk are considered and the fact that all species are treated the same. There is no opportunity to prioritize with regard to recognizing the impacts of climate change or to recognizing fringe species, which might be just present in a small part of Canada but abundant south of the border.