As I said—one of the cornerstones in terms of David's point—the impaired beneficial use that most affected Toronto was our waterfront beaches. We pride ourselves as being the largest city in the country and having 11 beaches across our waterfront. Arguably, the wet weather flows, and the multitudes of them—the combined sewer overflows and the storm sewer discharges, the riverine discharges along our waterfront—have been most problematic in terms of impairing water quality. We have made significant strides forward in improving water quality at those beaches but much work remains, particularly at those beaches that are located at the mouths of river systems.
In addition to that, for those of you who do know Toronto, our inner harbour, which is really where the designation of this area of concern originated, is without question probably the most challenged body of water within the city. It is the area that is receiving most of the combined sewer overflow discharges. From my standpoint, I will refer to it as the high-rent district. This is where the high-priced condominiums are, and you can only imagine if looking out your window during one of these heavy rains, you see floatable material that is a result of the discharge across that waterfront area as well as the lower Don River, which has been the poster child for being one of the most heavily polluted rivers in the country.