In answer to your question, we have a lot of farm drains. There are more drains in Chatham-Kent than there are in the rest of Ontario combined, and again, a municipal drain in Ontario is a legal concept. The reality is a municipal drain looks like a stream and functions as a stream in many cases, and fish and other organisms don't distinguish whether they're in a municipal drain or a stream. It's part of the ecosystem.
We need to take, as I said earlier, a systems approach, and the old method of saying this is a drain so the Drainage Act applies and this is something else so a different piece of legislation applies, in fact a different agency applies, that underscores the problem. We have a hodgepodge of regulations, layer upon layer upon layer, and I think that really became the breaking point that resulted in things like the Fisheries Act getting yanked.
I would be the first to admit we have an abundance of regulation. What we need is effective regulation based on a very systematic approach, looking at the problem and understanding that we need farm drainage, we need fisheries habitat, we need to prevent phosphorus from being displaced off farmland into the Great Lakes where it's causing.... There is no regulatory planning mechanism that requires that to be done. The Ontario Planning Act doesn't quite get the job done. Conservation authorities have the ability to do watershed planning. There is no ability to implement a watershed plan other than the extent to which you can get others to voluntarily buy in to doing their share of it. The Grand River has an initiative going on right now that is a good example of that.