That said, the New York City water supply example, which I think has been a very successful program...I heartily endorse that approach.
In terms of direct projects it's funny. I'd like to point out that our government has something called the recreational fisheries conservation partnerships program. Right by Mississauga the Rattray Marsh was remediated using funds from that program. Again I think the angling community is very numerous in the watershed, and many groups there are partnering with them, accessing the $25-million fund from the recreational fisheries conservation partnerships program, which did not exist a year ago. That's brand new money. In the spirit of directing money at real projects that do real things, that might be worth doing.
Mr. Pearson, I was very interested in your presentation, especially the $300 million that is spent annually on water quality in the Great Lakes. All three of you talked about the importance of the nearshore and habitat and wetlands and so on. What is your view on the concept of habitat banking, which has the potential to unleash significant funds from industry to perhaps do some of the habitat work that you would like to see done?