I think it depends upon where you live.
Locally, in a very agricultural base in the municipalities around Cornwall, they would not be very aggressive with respect to that, because they know where their voter base is, and you're losing revenue when you have setbacks.
Other areas that have a stronger tourism base, for example, as a base of the economy, will be.... Probably the best example right now is Lake Simcoe. To draw that into the public engagement piece, Lake Simcoe's phosphorus strategy is a set document which sets out the technical requirements, but which also creates a communication piece to say, “Okay, folks, we're going to do this together.” That is one of the strengths of that kind of “here's the plan” approach.
They have done some very good work in Simcoe, and Bay of Quinte actually has these numbers too, in setting out exactly from what different source each phosphorus is and where the phosphorus is coming from, how many megatonnes of phosphorus is coming from different places. In some places, the sewage treatment plant is actually a minor source, and more is coming in from the agricultural areas. That's where you then have a municipality coming forward and saying, “Yes, we'd like to see these improvements.”
This is the sort of thing that best management practice is. A lot of it is low-hanging fruit. A lot of it is just little things, but it all adds up.