The model that I referenced, that I think is the most comprehensive and the most up to date right now, is in the U.K. What they're doing in the U.K. is supporting, in our particular case, a higher price for electricity to support innovative systems as opposed to proven systems. They basically have a power-pricing regime. For example, if we generate electricity with our system, we get, say, 18ยข per kilowatt for power as opposed to traditional incineration where you get about half that.
The whole idea there is that you take the capital risk up front and you take the technology risk, and if you can produce additional electricity, because you believe your system is superior, they'll give you an incentive at the back end.
Now, some of that is happening in Canada, but not a lot. At provincial levels, the Ontario government has participated in that.
One possibility would be for the Government of Canada to consider participating in that as well, because the incentive is at the back end. I think the thinking is that eventually, as the technologies are proven and commercialized, the incentives can be reduced over time.
That's the most well-known model, I believe.