I agree. It's sort of like the big bang theory. It just keeps going.
To go back to that extended producer responsibility piece from the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, the definition that was adopted for extended producer responsibility is this, “an environmental policy approach in which a producer's responsibility for a product is extended to the post-consumer stage of its life cycle.”
That seems pretty straightforward to me. Is it an acceptable definition from your perspective? You are nodding your head, “yes”, and as you remember from your court days, you have to say it out loud.