Yes. We support extended producer responsibility. We have the paper in front of us. It is the right direction, and of course the thing that then happens is that when each jurisdiction starts to move ahead to put it in place and design it, it becomes “how well is it working, are there unintended consequences?”
Unfortunately we saw that in spades in Ontario with the way some of the stewardship programs were working in the eco-feeds and this kind of thing. Ontario, for example, has been engaged in a process of trying to reintroduce and reshape its waste legislation, which just died on the order paper here with our provincial election.
It's generally the right direction, but it's a matter of “is it getting done?”, and “is it getting done in a way that's avoiding unintended consequences and wrong incentives while they design the programs?”