At least in terms of balance, when a lot of good work has been done, it's perhaps helpful to recognize it. For example, expanding the Nahanni legally gives protection to some 500 grizzlies. That would be a huge conservation gain and it seems to me that would be a significant ecological improvement toward the objectives we're looking at.
I want to go to another aspect here quickly. In terms of managing biodiversity, is it your understanding that the SARA actually applies to subspecies? Are subspecies of as much concern as species in general? Was that the intent of the act, to protect subspecies?