Going to Mr. Sopuck's concern, you say, “Environment Canada's efforts on migratory bird conservation is centred primarily on waterfowl, with good results”, etc., etc. Then you critique it, and then the department responds and says, “The Department agrees with all of the recommendations”. Either something's wrong here or something's not wrong. If the department is agreeing that something is wrong, which is what you've identified here, I don't know how the government then turns around and says it is doing perfectly fine. Those two thoughts can't live in the same universe, the department agreeing and simultaneously the government saying it is meeting all of its targets and obligations.
