No. Your perspective there is what I'm looking for and I appreciate it. Thank you.
I want to move on to some other questions around funding for our species at risk. You say the department is not in a position to measure what aspects of recovery plans it's providing funding for. So there's this idea that we don't know how effective the funding is and what the end results are. I look at the last budget and I think that about $20 million is going to the Nature Conservancy, or somewhere around that. I'm not saying that the Nature Conservancy isn't doing good work, but it's concerning to me that we would be handing over $20 million to any organization.
I know it's clear in black and white in your report, but can you tell us a bit more about how we don't know how effective that money is or what it's being used for, or if it's cheating the end goals? That's correct, isn't it?