So you would think that we should perhaps be looking at what we're going to have left in five years to understand whether.... As you say, the two most capable icebreakers will be decommissioned. Are we going to have enough capacity to deal with...? I mean, we're dealing with an Arctic that's fairly large, one of the largest Arctic systems in the world, and where ice shifting is now unpredictable in terms of where the heavy ice will be.
Was there any sense that there needs to be an icebreaker on either side of the islands in order to deal with the issues we have? I notice today that we have another community that's suffering because multi-year ice moved in and they can't get their resupply. This has happened over and over again. What it says is that you need icebreakers in various locations.