What I agree with, with respect to the recommendation, is that clear and available information about our processes is key to helping Canadians understand the act and how it applies. That gets to the heart of transparency, not only being aware of what the decisions are but how they are formulated and how the process works.
I feel a bit of disagreement with the assertion that Canadians don't have confidence. The commissioner indicated that transparency is important for maintaining confidence. In the objective review that I saw—specifically, I'll refer to chapter 4 rather than any other comments that might have since been made publicly—no evidence was ever presented to me that the public have no confidence or have limited confidence in the act.