What I'm concerned about is that if the scope of your audit was to determine Environment Canada's performance under that three-year plan by suggesting that something more should happen after that's complete, you're really giving us a critique on the design of that plan. You're saying that design should have included a post-2015 element. If you're giving us such a critique, I want to know what rigour you've applied to be critical of that design.
On October 8th, 2014. See this statement in context.