I think it's important for members to understand that the National Parks Act states that the minister shall give “ecological integrity” the “first priority”. That clause was challenged by CPAWS legally against a previous minister, and what the court ruled is basically that there can be several priorities, and if the minister has considered that, in that case she met her objective.
From our perspective, when I look at the history from a court perspective and I look at what's before you for debate, I think we will ensure that this place is strongly protected for future generations.