No. In fact, it's quite the contrary.
One of the things they are happy about in long-term leases is we would look at land.... In the past, because of the one-year leases, with drainage tiles and other things that have been broken or not replaced, they would be able to keep that land in productive land use and take other pieces of their land that they know would fit in better from an ecological perspective and have those be used for that purpose. We could take those lands out of their leases, have them pay for that land that is productive, and have them actually have ecological benefit.
We've had excellent conversations with the farmers around that, which I'm sure they'll be happy to talk to the group about.