I hear what you're saying. I still am left with...it's not even a feeling; I believe a lot of these things need to be worked out in the legislation and not in the management plan. I believe we're smart people in this room. We can figure out a way to protect farmers and ensure they're not going to be evicted off their land. I know we can do that. It can be in the legislation, and everybody will understand. Yes, there's some different stuff we have to do here, because it's an urban park; I just don't accept that we should leave it to the management plan.
In my last seconds—you probably won't have time to answer this—I don't understand that the Rouge park bill has that clause, about dedicating the park for the benefit of the people of Canada. Am I wrong that it's not in the Rouge park bill but only in the National Parks Act?