Well the IUCN, which is the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, is essentially the body that sets international standards for what is considered to be a protected area. The IUCN definition says that it's:
a clearly defined geographical space, recognised, dedicated and managed, through legal or other effective means, to achieve the long term conservation of nature with associated ecosystem services and cultural values.
That's their definition. They particularly say and clarify in their guidance that only those areas for which the main objective is conserving nature can be considered protected areas. There is a prioritization laid out in the IUCN definition, which in our view is one of the key reasons that having it as a primary lens for management decisions is so important and so vital to the park.
This does not need to come into conflict with other uses. In fact, the legislation has the visitorship, the agricultural pieces, and all those other goals. In fact, it says that it can include many areas with other goals as well at the same level, but that in case of conflict, nature conservation is the priority. It's about using it as a filter through which you look at all those decisions.