I just want to pick up on Ms. Ambler's $250 million announcement about the national conservation plan, which I assume is accompanied by the usual panoply of photo ops and background.
I'm looking at the main estimates, and they say the major increases are an increase in funding of $46 million for the national conservation plan. It goes on and adds other stuff for weather services and world-class tankers, etc. Then they say the increases are offset by the decreases of $53 million, which includes the big hit to sustainable development. Another decrease is to species at risk. This looks like sideways money. Then when I look in more detail, they talk about a $22.5 million grant in support of the natural areas conservation program, which is a new column.
Mr. McLean, is this just sideways money—you're taking from Peter to pay Paul—or is this actually fresh money?