Here's the thing. I have the forestry industry in my office wondering if I care about forestry right now. We're over time, so I'll make this quick.
There are two things happening at once. One is the very definition of bad faith negotiations, which is the following. You make concessions and you make agreements, and then you revisit them and then revisit them again and then undo them. The concessions that I made to support unanimously other priorities of other parties were done in that good faith—fine.
The second piece is around the climate change issue itself, which I do think is incredibly pressing. It's very good that the government has this process going on, but the government also went to Paris and made a 1.5 degree agreement with no economic analysis and no understanding of even what the federal government's contribution to climate change is.
Lo and behold, it seems like that would be important for all of us to understand and appreciate. I've lost that argument, and that's fine.
I have to go. The committee will make the decision on the calendar as they see fit. I will move a motion that we study climate change this spring. Vote against it, which I was trying to avoid for you. So be it.