Thank you. It's a good question.
The perspective is that on the Kinder Morgan, Line 3, and so on, those pipelines were already in process for a number of years and were based on the previous regulatory review process. The interim piece was put on there, there was additional consultation, and there was a decision made on Gateway, Kinder Morgan, and Line 3—two positive, one negative. However, they were, let's say, the fruits of the ongoing system that was not necessarily a perfect system either.
Now we're in a situation where we've had almost two years of consultation on regulatory reform, NEB reform, to put in place policies that will hopefully lead to clarity and certainty on pipelines going forward.
I'm talking about major pipelines, tens of billions of dollars of pipelines. When we look at the new proposed legislation without having all the details of how all of this is going to mesh together and work on the early engagement process, how all these other policy things are going to come in and affect the process, we say, well, this is very problematic, because it's very uncertain as to how this is going to proceed in the future. We need the clarity, and the clarity is not there.