It probably helps if I read the broader definition of navigable waters that we put in place under this new act. It includes a body of water that is used, or likely to be used, as a means for vessel travel or transport—including as a means of travel or transport for indigenous peoples to exercise their rights—and where there is public access, two or more waterfront owners, or where the crown is the sole waterfront owner.
I think, probably, the defining of what constitutes a navigable waters act frames it properly.