Thank you. That's helpful, and in that vein of depoliticizing, I will go strictly to substance on an interesting issue raised by the electricity association around a privative clause. As far as I'm aware, your association is the only one to have advanced this proposal formally, and as someone who has operated in the legal field for some time on natural resources and environmental issues, I'm curious about it.
I'm curious about the suggestion both from the industry side and from the public interest community side, because it would seem to me that the opening of a privative clause that would restrict the involvement of the judiciary in an oversight role over the executive decision-making pursuant to an impact assessment process would potentially not only limit a given community or special interest group's ability to bring into question the quality of the decision or the actual following of particular steps that are legally required, but, on the other hand, could also impact industry to the extent that if a company or an industry association that felt like a particular project didn't get a fair shake, potentially because it was heavily politicized, such a process would then not be as effectively challengeable—