I think it's a great idea, as I said before. I would add two functions of this body if it is implemented. One would be to provide alternative dispute resolution in multi-jurisdictional negotiations, government-to-government negotiations, all the way through. In the planning phase, for example, if jurisdictions can't come up with an agreement to conduct an assessment, this tribunal could either provide mediation or arbitration to get us to a process that everybody agrees on.
Second, I would recommend equipping this body to undertake quality assurance programs for project-level follow-up programs as well as for the implementation of the act in general. I think one of the witnesses yesterday was talking about how a quality assurance program would greatly contribute to the learning in environmental assessments in general. Having some kind of an independent oversight body to do that would really help us to begin to learn from these assessments.