I'm happy to address that. As I suggested in my submissions, the idea of a dedicated review tribunal to, in the first instance, review final decisions made under proposed section 65 of the bill is a good idea in my view. Certainly, courts are the default body and can turn their minds to these issues, but to have a body that is both independent and has some expertise in environmental assessments could also be helpful.
As to the model of Ontario's Environmental Review Tribunal, I think it's potentially helpful. I would mention, though, that the issue of access to the tribunal in terms of a leave test is a barrier that ought not to be replicated if we are going to do that federally.