Wow. That was very nicely compressed. Let me try to deal with some of that.
Yes, I do hear the point and the point is well made about the issue of how one entity can deal with these various aspects. I don't have a simple answer for you other than I think we do have a path where you can have an entity that has a tribunal component to it, and that's the way we recommended this. You would have some part of the agency with a board, or whatever we're going to call it, with an adjudicative function. Over to the side, if I can call it that, is a distinctive branch that wasn't controlled by the other parts of it. That's where we try to get to, because we are concerned about a couple things, and you got to this.
How do you get early planning? Is early planning adjudication? No, it isn't. The adjudication and the early planning parts to this are complicated. What we wanted to do was to have an independent body do an assessment, as you've pointed out, and we wanted to have some adjudicative means at the end of it all to deal with it, or in the middle of it to do dispute resolution. I don't think that is problematic if a statute expressly authorizes all the different parts to it. To me it's a kind of balance of powers problem, and you specify the roles of the various entities. That's really the best I can say about this. I don't think they're necessarily in tension, but they need to be separated by a statutory mandate.
There were a few other questions, but you may get back to me.