I'd like to think that we were not quite as absolute as saying they shouldn't have any role. I think what we were really concerned about was the idea that some two of the three legs to environmental assessment right now were largely industry regulators and were, at least in the case of the National Energy Board, in some public controversy over how independent they were of the industry they were regulating.
What we were trying to do was to disentangle the impact assessment component of their mandates from their regulatory components. We were pretty blunt about having an agency lead IA, but I'm not troubled by the idea that they work together with those regulators.
What we're trying to do, though, is to speak to the point that you have to have some independence to do IA that isn't simply covered by the industry mandate, if I could put it that way. That's what we're wrestling with.