That's a really interesting question and I think it's something we need to consider. It's our opinion that it could be appropriate, thinking about it from the perspective of an energy regulator and the projects that would fall under the energy regulator. It is something we do need to think about.
When we were proposing it, we were not just thinking about the assessment process but about the entire life cycle and the number of places where better public participation is needed along the life cycle. We think that it could work to use it in the impact assessment for projects that would fall under the CER, but that also would need careful consideration. We wouldn't say that is an absolute requirement. Rather, we see it as a value, as a mechanism that could really ensure that we have access and representation all along the entire life cycle of a project.